On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 05:47:28PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote:
>
> > I agree, but it takes an I-D to do the update, yes?
> >
> > <tp>
> > I don't see why; the registry is expert review and we are doing a change
> > that comes under permitted changes for a YANG module, ie a status change.
>
> My understanding is that a publication of a draft altering an IANA registry
> will trigger an “expert review”, if that registry was created with the
> update-policy set that way. The draft itself doesn’t request an expert
> review, the expert review happens in the background. I’m not familiar with
> this being done without an I-D, in order to show WG consensus.
>
My understanding is that IANA reviews all documents during the
publication process and while performing this review they will notice
that something is requested to be added/changed in a registry that
requires expert review and then they will go and run the procedure.
My understanding is this is _one_ way to make a request to IANA but
not the only way to make a request to IANA.
The more interesting bit is what IANA has to say about this registry:
iana-crypt-hash YANG Module RFC 7317
Expert Review (Expert: Unassigned)
Perhaps we should focus more on finding a volunteer willing to take
the role of the Designated Expert...
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
