On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 05:47:28PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote: > > > I agree, but it takes an I-D to do the update, yes? > > > > <tp> > > I don't see why; the registry is expert review and we are doing a change > > that comes under permitted changes for a YANG module, ie a status change. > > My understanding is that a publication of a draft altering an IANA registry > will trigger an “expert review”, if that registry was created with the > update-policy set that way. The draft itself doesn’t request an expert > review, the expert review happens in the background. I’m not familiar with > this being done without an I-D, in order to show WG consensus. >
My understanding is that IANA reviews all documents during the publication process and while performing this review they will notice that something is requested to be added/changed in a registry that requires expert review and then they will go and run the procedure. My understanding is this is _one_ way to make a request to IANA but not the only way to make a request to IANA. The more interesting bit is what IANA has to say about this registry: iana-crypt-hash YANG Module RFC 7317 Expert Review (Expert: Unassigned) Perhaps we should focus more on finding a volunteer willing to take the role of the Designated Expert... /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod