Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> wrote:
cb> How about
>>
cb> {::include foo-????-??-??.yang}
>>
cb> and, if there is no such file, kramdown-rfc expands the wild card in
cb> the directory and uses the numerically latest file?
>>
>> You'd use shell globs?
> Yes. Any need to go beyond that?
>> I think it might be better to use PCRE.
> Much more typing and backslash-mangling, and I don’t see the use case.
DOS/Windows people don't get shell globs, and "?" is not something they know.
>> It might be better to have this as "winclude"
> So ‘loseclude’ would be including all matches?
hah.
> (What does the “w” stand for?)
wildcard.
cb> (There might also be a use-case for actually including all these
cb> files, so I’m still in thinking mode, but I think this is close.)
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
