Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net> wrote:
> An IANA registry cannot be used to extend RFC 8366 now…if that were
> desired, it would have had to be defined by RFC 8366. A revision of
> RFC 8366 could define such behavior, but then would might wonder why
> not use the revision to instead flip "leaf assertion” to “type
> identityref”.
Yes, okay, so if we have to revise 8366, then this sounds like something we
should do.
> FWIW, "leaf assertion” is not used by SZTP (RFC 8572).
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
