Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-20: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the efforts on this document. I have following comments, by addressing them I believe will improve the document quality - Section 2.1 : Should it not say if the "content-schema" node exists then one of the methods MUST be used? as I see the specification of content schema is a SHOULD, hence may not be included for whatever reason. - Section 4 : it says Instance data files may contain sensitive data. OK, but what should be taken into consideration when putting the sensitive data in the data file. It feels like there should be more information provided to the user of the specification for actually materialize the statement made here. _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
