Carsten: I think this issue might be difficult for human to perceive but could be easily captured by machine readable document tool. Maybe the formal description techniques effort (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/fdt/) can help build tool to check this. Also I am wondering whether we can capture this inconsistency issue in the output of online xml2rfc tool (https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/) with the warning or error. Probably many of us will not take them seriously if it is the warning.
-Qin -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Carsten Bormann [mailto:c...@tzi.org] 发送时间: 2021年11月22日 18:46 收件人: Qin Wu <bill...@huawei.com> 抄送: Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net>; Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwil...@cisco.com>; Erik Auerswald <auers...@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>; netmod@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; rfc...@rfc-editor.org; m...@lowentropy.net 主题: Re: [netmod] [Errata Verified] RFC8792 (6739) On 2021-11-20, at 03:51, Qin Wu <bill...@huawei.com> wrote: > > inconsistency issues on source xml file introduced not by author of this RFC, I think the underlying issue here is that verified Errata are generally perceived as quality feedback for the authors (visible to everyone), but in this case it wasn’t the authors that made the mistake. This is of course not solvable, as blame assignment is not one of the functions of the errata reporting system, but we can’t prevent that it will be perceived as such. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
