tom petch <ie...@btconnect.com> wrote:
> draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls augments RFC8519 but while the RFC
> structures its matches as a series of choices, the augmentation
> does not. Should it?
What in practice does this mean for the YANG?
> The I-D has passed WGLC but has been delayed by me making
> editorial comments. AFAICT the I-D has not had a YANG Doctor
> review.
Seems that this should have happened.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
