From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> Sent: 07 December 2022 11:56
NETMOD WG, From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanand...@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 6:58 PM Is this in-lieu of a call for adoption, or did I somehow miss the call for adoption? I do see a separate IPR call. Either ways, I do support the work, whether as a separate draft or as a bis of the original work. Would have preferred the latter, if not for anything else but to see how a YANG model can be updated in IETF. This is a separate draft. I would be opposed to a BIS of RFC 8519. While the new capabilities are useful, I doubt anyone is going to implement them any time soon so let’s not complicate RFC 8519. <tp> Me too - separate draft. Tom Petch Thanks, Acee Cheers. On Dec 5, 2022, at 2:41 PM, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org<mailto:ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org>> wrote: The NETMOD WG has placed draft-dbb-netmod-acl in state Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Lou Berger) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dbb-netmod-acl/ _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
