Greetings Rob, We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial. Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata report to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).
You may review the report at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7313 Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further information on how to verify errata reports. Further information on errata can be found at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php. Thank you. RFC Editor/cs > On Jan 18, 2023, at 7:02 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8519, > "YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7313 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> > > Section: A.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > The following figure is the tree diagram of example-newco-acl. In > this example, /ietf-acl:acls/ietf-acl:acl/ietf-acl:aces/ietf-acl:ace/ > ietf-acl:matches are augmented with two new choices: protocol- > payload-choice and metadata. The protocol-payload-choice uses a > grouping with an enumeration of all supported protocol values. > Metadata matches apply to fields associated with the packet, that are > not in the packet header, such as overall packet length. In another > example, /ietf-acl:acls/ietf-acl:acl/ietf-acl:aces/ietf-acl:ace/ > ietf-acl:actions are augmented with a new choice of actions. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > The following figure is the tree diagram of example-newco-acl. In > this example, /acl:acls/acl:acl/acl:aces/acl:ace/acl:matches > are augmented with two new choices: protocol-payload-choice and > metadata. The protocol-payload-choice uses a > grouping with an enumeration of all supported protocol values. > Metadata matches apply to fields associated with the packet, that are > not in the packet header, such as overall packet length. In another > example, /acl:acls/acl:acl/acl:aces/acl:ace/acl:actions > are augmented with a new choice of actions. > > Notes > ----- > The prefix is "acl" not "ietf-acl" > > == > module ietf-access-control-list { > yang-version 1.1; > namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-access-control-list"; > prefix acl; > ... > == > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8519 (draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-21) > -------------------------------------- > Title : YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs) > Publication Date : March 2019 > Author(s) : M. Jethanandani, S. Agarwal, L. Huang, D. Blair > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Network Modeling > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
