Authors/All,
One of the authors pointed out that the list of contributors was
incomplete, and specifically didn't include all listed in the paragraph
of the contributors section. We had mistakenly read this paragraph as
Acknowledgments versus Contributors. It does appear that some of those
listed may be Contributors, i.e., materially contributed to the
technical solution or the text (excluding editorial changes), while
others may in fact belong in an Acknowledgement section. Given this,
we'd like to ask the authors to refactor the Contributors section into
separate Acknowledgement and Contributor sections before moving forward
on this document. Once we have the new version, we can then judge if
there are any missing IPR statements.
Thank you,
Lou and Kent
On 1/16/2023 5:53 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
Authors, Contributors, WG,
In preparation for WG Last Call
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
If yes to the above, please state either:
"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor
please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author.
NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see
https://www.ietf.org/standards/ipr/
Thank you,
Lou and Kent
PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod