Authors,
I may have missed it, but was the point below addressed?
On 7/3/2023 2:23 PM, Andy Bierman wrote:
YANG authors should not need to tag nodes with specific metrics at all.
I am not convinced that standard tags like "counter," or "loss," or
"delay" are useful.
IMO it would be better to keep standard tags in their own RFC(s),
especially something as complicated as metrics classification.
As contributor, I too have a hard time seeing the value of having tags
that map directly to attributes such as delay, jitter, and loss - I'd
expect the tags to map to classes not instances of attributes.
From a process perspective, can you explain why references in IETF
tags, section 9.2, are not *normative*? (note some are not even lisyted
in the references section.)
Thanks,
Lou
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
