Hi Balazs,
AFAIK an errata does not lead to an updated "official" module somewhere. I seem
to recall that this was brought up by Benoit and/or Rob some time ago, but I
might be misremembering. I agree that having individual consumers apply the
errata isn't great.
Regards,Reshad.
On Wednesday, August 23, 2023, 09:28:21 AM EDT, Balázs Lengyel
<balazs.lengyel=40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
Hello,
If a YANG module in an RFC is updated by errata (e.g.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/rfc6470) is an official updated IETF YANG
module published somewhere?
At the moment I don’t find an official update for
ietf-netconf-notification.yang, thus the only thing my company can do is to
create and use an unofficial update to the IETF module. That is nasty as a
vendor should not change IETF modules. But is there any better solution?
LONG TERM: my preference would be that the errata should include the updated
module which should be published on the IETF github. (A full bis updated would
be preferred, but unlikely to happen.)
Regards Balazs
P.S. Sorry if this was discussed, but I don’t remember.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
