Dear all,
For the same reasons as Adrian, I support adoption.
However, I would not rush to publish the new version.
We keep learning and we must document this knowledge (see "List name:
singular or plural?" which we all thought was documented).
Also, we will hopefully soon have a significant change (see
https://notes.ietf.org/netmod-2023-sept-poll?view): we should make sure
that RFC8407bis takes this into account. In other words, I see a
dependency for this document: the NBC outcome.
Regards, Benoit
On 9/12/2023 10:40 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
Hi Lou,
Yes, it is totally appropriate that we revisit this guidance. A lot has been
learned in the five years since 8407 and the long list of updates already in
this draft show that there is work to be done.
Adopt and work.
Cheers,
Adrian
-----Original Message-----
From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2023 11:22 PM
To: NETMOD Group <netmod@ietf.org>
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-cha...@ietf.org>
Subject: [netmod] WG adoption call: draft-boucadair-netmod-rfc8407bis-02
Hello,
This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-netmod-rfc8407bis/
Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the
list by the end of the day (any time zone) Sept 25.
Thank you,
Lou (as Co-chair)
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
