All authors and contributors have responded indicating no awareness of IPR 
applying to this draft.

The adoption call may proceed now.

Kent // chair


> On Mar 25, 2024, at 7:44 PM, Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net> wrote:
> 
> [This draft moved from OPSAWG to NETMOD]
> 
> 
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
> 
> As a prerequisite for the adoption on this document:
> 
>       A Common YANG Data Model for Scheduling
>       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ma-opsawg-schedule-yang/
> 
>       Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
> 
> Please state either:
> 
>       "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft”
>       or
>       "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
> 
> If yes to the above, please state either:
> 
>       "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules”
>       or
>       "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> 
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author.
> 
> Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it.
> 
> PS: Currently no IPR is filed for this draft: 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ma-opsawg-schedule-yang
> 
> 
> Thanks.
> Kent Watsen (as co-chair)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to