Hi all,
Mahesh raised a comment for a document I'm editing:
====
>
> Do the authors want to add a statement that says no rpcs are defined,
> and therefore no security considerations need to be documented for
> them.
[Med] Not sure that is needed. Please note that the template only requests to
add RPC cons where these are defined:
-- if your YANG module has defined any RPC operations
-- describe their specific sensitivity or vulnerability.
Do you see a value in saying it explicitly? If so, we need to have this
included in the template.
====
Any preference about updating the template?
Cheers,
Med
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
