> I also share the concern raised by Juergen as to whether they various updates > to NMDA are going to leave us with a consistent coherent architecture. I.e., > there is part of me that is wondering whether we should have been bis’ing RFC > 8342 instead, since it feels that we are fundamentally changing the > architecture because system feeds into the validation of intended.
I agree that an rfc8342bis would be nice. I’d like to see it include the <factory> datastore, as well as clarify that <running> is valid vis-a-vis <intended> being valid. Also, it is probably worth stating that <intended>, whilst subject to validation, may not be used internally. Specifically, whilst we want templates to be expanded in <intended> (e.g., for validation), the internal system may NOT want the templates expanded, in order to have a more memory-efficient implementation. Kent // contributor
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
