On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 11:34 AM Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I do not understand how <running> references <system>. > > How does a config leafref in <running> validate correctly unless the > pointed-at leaf is also in <running>? > > The same issue applies to templates if the incomplete list entry in > <running> has any pointed-at leafs. > > This statement assumes that <intended> is subject to validation. > > <running> + <system> = <intended> > > Seems like some fundamental changes to NMDA., but maybe not, since now <running> + proprietary-magic = <intended>. My concern is for offline validation. RFC 7950 and 8342 both say <running> MUST be valid. There is a desire for a client to (1) retrieve a representation of the entire <running> datastore and (2) perform the YANG validation tests on the retrieved data There is no problem on the server because the <running> datastore is valid if the server says so (e.g. return <ok> for edit-config or validate operations). > Kent // contributor > > Andy
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
