Hi Template Enthusiasts, Sorry for the long delay. I wish to pick up this discussion again. The requirements (here <https://github.com/netmod-wg/template-reqs/issues>) are solidifying, but please note that #4 <https://github.com/netmod-wg/template-reqs/issues/4> is false.
Hi Deepak, Thank you for the prompt. I will create a Doodle poll for everyone on the CC, and then create a virtual interim for the selected time, Kent > On Jan 13, 2025, at 2:51 AM, Deepak Rajaram (Nokia) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello All, > > Wishing you all a Happy New Year !! My warm and best wishes for you and your > loved ones. 😊 > > Looking at the issue tracker on GitHub: > https://github.com/netmod-wg/template-reqs/issues, i see around 15 > requirements captured, do we wait for further inputs or would it be ok to go > further on scoring/analysing the requirements? > > Regards, > Deepak > > From: Kent Watsen <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Sent: Monday, December 2, 2024 9:10 PM > To: Robert Peschi (Nokia) <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: [netmod] Re: Mandatory/default statements and templates (was: Yang > Template Proposals) > > > CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking > links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext <http://nok.it/ext> for > additional information. > > > Hi Robert, > > Thank you for adding comments to the requirements on the GitHub issue tracker. > > There will be a meeting in a few weeks for Template Enthusiasts to > discuss/score the various requirements collected thus far. This is what was > requested from the 121 Session 2 discussion. > > Kent // contributor > > > > On Dec 2, 2024, at 6:37 AM, Robert Peschi (Nokia) <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi Kent, > > I am OK about requirements #12, #13 and #14 which I also further commented as > follows: > > #12 The <running> datastore contains the unexpanded template > >That said, per #10 <https://github.com/netmod-wg/template-reqs/issues/10>, > >it may be possible to ask the device to return a expanded version of > Yes, absolutely. > In case of NMDA, this would be done by the client querying the intended > datastore of the device Server > In case of non-NMDA, the device would maintain a YANG state tree reflecting > the data expanded, that can be queried by the client. > #13: The <intended> datastore contains the expanded template > Note that templates are also usable in non-NMDA devices: in a non-NMDA > device, the device application software would expand the template in its > private memory. This expanded data could be made visible to a YANG client by > defining a state tree reflecting it. > >The datastore is subject to validation, which means that all the templates > >need to be expanded/flattened > As commented in requirement #14, pre-validating a template might accelerate > the validation of the expanded data > > #14: Off-box validation of <running> containing templates must be possible > >Expectation is that clients would perform the template-expansion step prior > >to using a validator (just like the servers do) > Note also that since a template contains a configuration matching the one of > a typical actual sub-bsystem (as defined in > draft-rajaram-yang-config-template-framework-00), it could likely be > pre-validated alone, prior being applied to actual sub-system. This > "done-once-for-all" template validation might accelerate the validation of > each sub-system expanded data ? > > Robert > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list -- [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
