Or, to give a slightly longer answer. It was intentional at the time that both 1 and 1.1 are valid and current versions of the YANG language. I cannot recall the exact reasoning for this decision at the time, but it is worth noting that a lot of YANG modules (e.g., OpenConfig and some vendors models) still use RFC 6020 rather than RFC 7950.
Kind regards, Rob From: tom petch <[email protected]> Date: Monday, 31 March 2025 at 12:52 To: Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [netmod] Re: RFC7950 vs RFC6020 From: Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Sent: 20 March 2025 08:20 Shouldn't RFC7950 Obsolete or Update RFC6020? <tp> No. Tom Petch (or at least not if you are an engineer - politicians may disagree:-( -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS* _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
