On 4. Apr 2025, at 10:16, Per Andersson <[email protected]> wrote: > > IMHO it is to the point, clear, and I agree with the text.
+1 Thanks for driving clear terminology forward. "YANG Data Module” sounds completely broken, good riddance. I’m not entirely sure about “YANG Model”, which seems a convenient shorthand for “YANG Data Model” (**); we will not be able to expunge this from the vernacular, but it helps to have a single common recommended term in the documents. Grüße, Carsten (**) [which actually is an interaction model, not a data model] _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
