On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 10:21 AM tom petch <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Per Andersson <[email protected]> > Sent: 10 April 2025 22:59 > > Hi! > > In my recent YANG Doctors review of draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model > I stated that it is a recommendation to not use the "-grouping" suffix for > grouping identifiers. > > I suggest we add the following text to rfc8407bis Section 4.3.1: > > Identifiers SHOULD NOT be prefixed or suffixed with their type. > For instance creating a grouping with the suffix "-grouping" > SHOULD be avoided. > > <tp> > > I don't know what you mean by type and think that a more precise wording is > needed. > > 'type' appears 235 times in this I-D so I see plenty of scope for confusion.
What about the following text Identifiers SHOULD NOT be prefixed or suffixed with their leaf type or YANG statement. For instance creating a grouping with the suffix "-grouping" SHOULD be avoided. > I am also unsure what this adds that the last paragraph of this section does > not already specify. It gives a concrete example. -- Per _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
