Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote:
> It seems unnecessary to register namespaces for templates that will
> never be used, but it seems like that is a decision already made. The
> new and updated registrations are fine if the group intends to
> proceed.
I think that the point is
a) have the template include worked out IANA process.
b) notice when someone didn't edit that part of the template
c) point puzzled people who see (b) in the field back to the right place.
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 10:42, David Dong via RT wrote:
>> Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: netmod WG),
>>
>> As the designated experts for the ns registry, can you review the
>> proposed registration in draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-24
>> (urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:iana-template)? We will also update the
>> Reference for urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-template.
>>
>> Please see:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis/
>>
>> The due date is May 7th.
>>
>> If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication,
>> we'll make the registration at:
>>
>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/
>>
>> Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewer, we’ll act on the
>> first response we receive.
>>
>> With thanks,
>>
>> David Dong
>> IANA Services Sr. Specialist
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
