Document: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis Title: Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-24 Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date: 2025-04-24 IETF LC End Date: 2025-05-05 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: The document is well written, and easy to read. However, I do have a question regarding the normative terminology that I would like the authors to address. Major issues: N/A Minor issues: N/A Nits/editorial comments: The document contains lots (especially for a BCP) of MUST/SHOULD/MAY/MOST NOT etc. First, it is unclear whether the MUST/SHOULD/... is defined by this document, or whether it comes from the YANG specification. Second, it is unclear what the criteria for MUST vs SHOULD is. Does it e.g., mean that a YANG validator will return an error is a MUST is not followed? _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
