> Draft: > - Nit: Would it make sense to at least publish nodes that correspond to the > revisions in the example model? > > [JMC] So that I’m clear, you mean add nodes like “wibble”, “bar”, and “foo” to > example-versioned-module so that they are more than just the descriptions of > the revisions?
Yes > - ietf-yang-semver: Should the encoding of the `extension version` argument > that is in the subsequent typedef pattern statement be mentioned or referred > here within the description? > > [JMC] Can you say a bit more here? Are you referring to updating the > description of the extension or the typedef? Actually, I think this is my miss as I see you already have the following text in the description stmt which covers this. ``` The format of the version extension argument MUST conform to the 'version' typedef defined in this module. ``` Thx /ebben _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
