Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-schedule-yang-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-schedule-yang/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Éric Vyncke, INT AD, comments for draft-ietf-netmod-schedule-yang-08 CC @evyncke Thank you for the work put into this document. Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points/nits (replies would be appreciated even if only for my own education). Special thanks to James Cumming for the shepherd's write-up including the WG consensus *but it lacks* the justification of the intended status. I hope that this review helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric ## COMMENTS (non-blocking) ### Compliant with NMDA ? AFAIK, RFC 8407 section 3.5 recommends stating in the introduction whether the YANG module complies with NMDA (RFC 8342). As draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis is not yet approved, it seems to me that the previous guidance should be followed. ### WGLC extended to calendaring WG The shepherd write-up says nothing about the potential extension of the WGLC to calendaring-related WG such as CALEXT or to the [email protected] mailing list. _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
