Hi Xufeng,
We have addressed your comments in rev-14. Thanks again for your review.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-14
Regards,Reshad.
On Thursday, July 10, 2025 at 07:37:34 PM EDT, Rahman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Thank you Xufeng. We will address your comments in the next revision.
Regards,
Reshad (on behalf of the authors).
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 7, 2025, at 9:44 AM, Xufeng Liu via Datatracker <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Document: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning
> Title: Updated YANG Module Revision Handling
> Reviewer: Xufeng Liu
> Review result: Ready
>
> This is a review of the YANG modules in
> draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-13.
>
> This document contains two simple YANG modules: ietf-yang-revisions and
> ietf-yang-library-status, which are clearly defined.
>
> 1) Data examples
> The module ietf-yang-library-status has added only two leaves. Even though the
> augmentation is simple, I am still wondering if it would be beneficial to
> provide a data example in the Appedix
>
> 2) Both ietf-yang-revisions and ietf-yang-library-status are defined in
> Section
> 7 “Module Versioning Extension YANG Modules”. Should ietf-yang-library-status
> be put into a different section?
>
> Thanks,
> - Xufeng
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
