Hi Scott/Rob, Were you planning on responding to this review? Thanks.
> On Oct 11, 2025, at 7:31 PM, Satoru Matsushima via Datatracker > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Document: draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang > Title: Common Interface Extension YANG Data Models > Reviewer: Satoru Matsushima > Review result: Ready with Nits > > Reviewer: Satoru Matsushima > Review Result: Ready with Nits > > I have reviewed this document as part of the IntArea directorate's ongoing > effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These > comments > were written primarily for the benefit of the internet area directors. > Document > editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last > call > comments. > > Overall this draft was well written and very useful not only from ops view but > from the int-area point of view as well, suppress-flapping, dampening to make > network stable. > > Nits: > - The lower/higher-layer-if definitions in RFC8343 would need to be better to > clarify the differences between sub-interface defined in this draft. > > - How the module can manage linux networking abstraction for example, bridge, > vrf interfaces would be better to mention in somewhere, like if a vlan > interfaces has one parent ethernet interface, the vlan interface also have the > bridge or vrf interface as another parent (or master). Please check whether > the > module support that or not. > > - A peer-interface of an interface pair would usually be associated to a > netns. > It would be better to mention that, and would be better to make the module to > be able to do that. > > > Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
