Please note that the Show of Hands polls for issue #15 
<https://github.com/netmod-wg/template-reqs/issues/15> and issue #17 
<https://github.com/netmod-wg/template-reqs/issues/17> show that most folks 
disagreed with returning the unexpanded templates in <intended> or 
<operational>.

Sorry if I caused any confusion.  To be clear, I agree with the poll-results 
(i.e., do not return unexpended templates from <intended> or <operational>.

Kent


> On Nov 11, 2025, at 9:05 AM, Deepak Rajaram (Nokia) 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Reshad, Kent,
>  
> Point noted, we will discuss and update.
>  
> This was discussed in the interim as well. As such, I am also not against in 
> having the unexpanded template config as part of the intended, considering 
> they both(running and intended) are conventional DS that have the same schema.
>  
> Regards,
> Deepak
>  
> From: Reshad Rahman <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2025 4:28 AM
> To: Kent Watsen <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; Deepak Rajaram (Nokia) <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [netmod] Template draft update
>  
>  
> CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking 
> links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional 
> information.
>  
> 
> Thanks Kent. I'd suggest putting that in an Operational Considerations 
> section...
>  
> Regards,
> Reshad.
>  
> On Monday, November 10, 2025 at 01:20:38 PM EST, Kent Watsen <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>  
>  
> I like Reshad's idea.
>  
> Kent // contributor
>  
> 
> 
> On Nov 7, 2025, at 2:02 PM, Reshad Rahman <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>  
> Hi,
>  
> One comment/question I had @ IETF123 was the ability to get the non-expanded 
> config (e.g. to check that the config on the device is what was pushed). I 
> just took a look at the latest revision and it seems simple to do so: 
> get-data on <running> will return non-expanded config whereas on get-data 
> <intended> will return expanded config. Worth mentioning in the document?
>  
> Regards,
> Reshad.
>  
> On Friday, November 7, 2025 at 12:33:48 AM EST, Deepak Rajaram (Nokia) 
> <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>  
>  
> Hello All,
> 
>  
> Just a quick update — work on the draft- YANG Configuration Templates 
> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-tt-netmod-yang-config-templates-00.html>
>  is continuing. We’re making steady progress considering the feedback from 
> IETF-123-Madrid, and will share the next revision once key sections including 
> the validation aspects are finalized. The requirements(from interim) 
> traceability is also being worked upon.
> 
>  
> Regards,
> 
> Deepak(On behalf of the authors)
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list -- [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list -- [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
>  

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to