Hi WG, Jürgen has found an issue with the regex pattern for ipv6-address-link-local definition in rfc6991-bis, which is still in AUTH48, and is suggesting a fix for it below. Does anyone have any objection to the change?
Thanks Begin forwarded message: > From: Jürgen Schönwälder <[email protected]> > Date: December 9, 2025 at 2:07:00 AM HST > To: [email protected] > Subject: bug in RFC 9911 to be (ipv6-address-link-local) > Reply-To: Jürgen Schönwälder <[email protected]> > > Hi, > > RFC to be 9911 is in AUTH48 and independent of that I privately > received a bug report concerning ipv6-address-link-local. The pattern > appears to be wrong: > > OLD: > > pattern '[fF][eE]80:.*'; > > NEW: > > pattern '[fF][eE][89aAbB].*'; > > The reason is that link-local addresses are identified by the prefix > fe80::/10 and the original pattern does not capture all of the > possible values. > > My question now is how we deal with this procedurally. Please advice. > > /js > > -- > Jürgen Schönwälder Constructor University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
