Hi Joe, > On Dec 18, 2025, at 7:17 AM, Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Also, thanks for mentioning Appendix A.1.1. and that pyang can be used in > determining BC or NBC changes. > > The document assumes publication of a new YANG module. How about a -bis > version that is still an I-D? What version number should authors use? > > [JMC] Since you mention “authors”, I assume you’re referring back to the > original YANG Semver draft as authors are out of scope for the IANA guidance > draft. That is specified in Section 6.1, specifically Section 6.1.3 talks > about how to version individual drafts of a bis work, and then what to do > when a draft is finally adopted. [mj] Thanks for those pointers. In the case of a draft-ietf-netmod-foo-bis, what I understand is this. Assuming the initial model has been published, this is what the revision number(s) would look like
Initial published model - 1.0.0 draft-ietf-netmod-foo-bis I-D that is intended to be BC - 1.1.0-draft-ietf-netmod-foo-bis-01, 02, 03 etc. draft-ietf-netmod-foo-bis I-D that is intended to be NBC - 2.0.0-draft-ietf-netmod-foo-bis-01, 02, 03 etc. BC model on publication - 1.1.0 NBC model on publication 2.0.0 Does that sound correct? Thanks. Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
