On 02/26/2013 05:39 AM, Jon Schipp wrote:
netsniff-ng did _much_ better as the RX ring buffer size increased.
Trafgen generated packets roughly at 70,000/sec and hit 150,000/sec
here and there.
On what packet size, what hardware? Gigabit Eth. or 10Gigabit/s Eth.?
At leat on Gigabit Ethernet I can generate almost linerate with
trafgen, in other words same speed as pktgen in the kernel, e.g.
~1,35Mio pps on 64 Byte pps, or 80k pps for 1500 Byte pps, etc.
Your measurements do not show that and I find this a bit confusing,
also you do not show std. deviation, how many runs you did, etc.
I have old equipment. For each test the sniffer was sent an SIGINT
after 30 seconds.
To get stats with daemonlogger I had to apply this patch:
http://www.inetric.com/downloads/dlsp/daemonlogger-stats-1.2.1.patch.bz2
Used in each case to generate large packets
# trafgen --in nst_udp_pkt_1472.txf --out eth1
./daemonlogger -i eth2
[-] Interface set to eth2
[-] Log filename set to "daemonlogger.pcap"
[-] Pidfile configured to "daemonlogger.pid"
[-] Pidpath configured to "/var/run"
[-] Rollover size set to 18446744071562067968 bytes
[-] Rollover time configured for 0 seconds
[-] Pruning behavior set to oldest IN DIRECTORY
-*> DaemonLogger <*-
Version 1.2.1
By Martin Roesch
(C) Copyright 2006-2007 Sourcefire Inc., All rights reserved
sniffing on interface eth2
start_sniffing() device eth2 network lookup: eth2: no IPv4 address assigned
Logging packets to daemonlogger.pcap.1361852851
Quitting!
Received by filter: 2242808; Dropped by Kernel: 738578 (32.93%);
Dropped by Interface: 0;
# ring buffer mode ( -r )
# ./daemonlogger -r -i eth2
[-] Interface set to eth2
[-] Log filename set to "daemonlogger.pcap"
[-] Pidfile configured to "daemonlogger.pid"
[-] Pidpath configured to "/var/run"
[-] Ringbuffer active
[-] Rollover size set to 18446744071562067968 bytes
[-] Rollover time configured for 0 seconds
[-] Pruning behavior set to oldest IN DIRECTORY
-*> DaemonLogger <*-
Version 1.2.1
By Martin Roesch
(C) Copyright 2006-2007 Sourcefire Inc., All rights reserved
sniffing on interface eth2
start_sniffing() device eth2 network lookup: eth2: no IPv4 address assigned
Logging packets to daemonlogger.pcap.1361852754
Quitting!
Received by filter: 2264939; Dropped by Kernel: 778509 (34.37%);
Dropped by Interface: 0;
# netsniff-ng --in eth2 --out dump -s -V
RX: 238.41 MiB, 122064 Frames, each 2048 Byte allocated
Running! Hang up with ^C!
2273174 packets incoming
1651930 packets passed filter
621244 packets failed filter (out of space)
27.3294% packet droprate
45 sec, 379233 usec in total
# netsniff-ng --in eth2 --out dump --ring-size 500MiB -s -V
RX: 500.00 MiB, 256000 Frames, each 2048 Byte allocated
Running! Hang up with ^C!
2262449 packets incoming
1775626 packets passed filter
486823 packets failed filter (out of space)
21.5175% packet droprate
47 sec, 808032 usec in total
# netsniff-ng --in eth2 --out dump --ring-size 1GiB -s -V
RX: 1024.00 MiB, 524288 Frames, each 2048 Byte allocated
Running! Hang up with ^C!
2238213 packets incoming
1969897 packets passed filter
268316 packets failed filter (out of space)
11.9880% packet droprate
63 sec, 296087 usec in total
# netsniff-ng --in eth2 --out dump --ring-size 2GiB -s -V
RX: 2048.00 MiB, 1048576 Frames, each 2048 Byte allocated
Running! Hang up with ^C!
2184949 packets incoming
2184949 packets passed filter
0 packets failed filter (out of space)
0.0000% packet droprate
44 sec, 871286 usec in total
I'll do a future blog post with more detail (cpu, interrupts, disk I/O
etc.) comparing other tools too.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Jon Schipp <[email protected]> wrote:
Configuring a new non-production server before I head home from work.
Heading out of town for the weekend.
Will be able to test sometime next weekend.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:25 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 6:43:57 PM UTC+3:30, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 02/12/2013 02:30 PM, Jon Schipp wrote:
I don't have any benchmarks between the two but I can recall from
personal experience that netsniff-ng was able to write all packets to
disk
when daemonlogger, under similar load, was dropping some of them.
Since benchmarks would be nice to have, I'll work on that soon.
I'd also be curious on that, i.e. a comparison of those tools under 10Gbps.
any update?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"netsniff-ng" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"netsniff-ng" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
