On 2016-08-08 at 16:31:11 +0200, Vadim Kochan <vadi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Tobias Klauser <tklau...@distanz.ch> wrote: > > On 2016-08-06 at 11:59:05 +0200, Vadim Kochan <vadi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Tobias Klauser <tklau...@distanz.ch> > >> wrote: > >> > On 2016-08-05 at 22:51:54 +0200, Vadim Kochan <vadi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes, I understand, I said so because I really remember we talked about > >> disabling of libnl support earier ago and you or Daniel pointed that > >> it is better to have this dependency by default, this is how I > >> remember this, I might be wrong, but anyway > >> it simplifies build netsniff-ng/trafgen manually w/o searching libnl- > >> packages on specific dist. > > > > I can't remember we talked about it, but that doesn't mean we didn't :) > > In any case if we discussed a particular feature/patch/RFC/... before > > and you patch is based on the previous discussion, please include a link > > to the respective mailing list thread into the description. This may > > help to remind us of past conversations ;) > > > > Thanks! > > This is a link with our discussion (within libnl-route fix titled with > "[PATCH] build: Check for libnl-route"), but I looked for this > just now so I did not consider it while writing previous email, so I > might be wrong for some conclusions): > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!searchin/netsniff-ng/Check$20for$20libnl-route%7Csort:relevance/netsniff-ng/0Ws7ecy1H_Y/DIzprE4KBAAJ
Thanks for the link. I don't see detailled discussion of how this should be implemented, just the general idea. And there, I think, we all agreed that it would be fine as long as it doesn't introduce too much additional complexity. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "netsniff-ng" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to netsniff-ng+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
