On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 09:02:06PM +0100, <efphe>: ~> In my opinion, the expiration time should be greater.
~> In my opinion netsukuku has to be a network for all people, also for ~> who join the net very rarely. Maybe two or three times each year! ~> It seems that we think at ntk users exclusevely as person like us. ~> Ntk has to be an open NET, and not a closed community of hackers. Yep ~> I propose 120, maybe 180. Then why not 360? The problem is that the more you maximize the expiration time, the more it becomes like a permanent hostname. Suppose we use hostnames without expiration time. What would happen? Another prospective is: a hname should be associated and used by _active_ nodes. What good would bring keeping an inactive hname for 4 months? ~> It's my opinion, but i'm feeling that it's easy sharable. IMHO, 60 is already an extreme value, but we can decide to use it. However, we should see clearly the difference between 30 and 120 before deciding further. (the difference between 3 and 30 is very clear). -- :wq! "I don't know nothing" The One Who reached the Thinking Matter '.' [ Alpt --- Freaknet Medialab ] [ GPG Key ID 441CF0EE ] [ Key fingerprint = 8B02 26E8 831A 7BB9 81A9 5277 BFF8 037E 441C F0EE ] _______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
