On 13 August 2008 16:38:12 Ricardo Lanziano wrote: > It depends entirely to the free time the devs have, and there is only a few > bits we can do about it: > > * Either code and submit patches Ok. I'll try to, but I need at least something like a plan what to do first :)
> * Or help with everything that isn't code (documentation, web site, > mailing lists, IRC, but mostly documentation) What are the problems with documentation? > "Q: Will Netsukuku be ported to Windows? > A: Short answer: if you code the port, yes. > Answer: We need coders for that. There are a lot of things to be done > and the Windows port is what we care less." So, nothing changed since October of 2007? > > - APs. Old C implementation was able to run on APs. New one depends on > > stackless python. There's only 1 mb of flash and 1-2 mb of free ram > > available on most APs, which is defenetely not enough. That's why I think > > that routing core should be rewritten in C. > > You can get a stackless python binary under the 1mb limit. You just need to > strip off everything you don't need from the original distribution. Even if it is possible to make a distribution of stackless in 700kb (we need ~250-300 kb for ntkd itself), i think we will be out of RAM. At the moment my htop shows me that pyntk listening to dummy interface uses 7 mb of ram. And there are 8 on devices at all in most cases. _______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
