Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 03:59:45PM +0100, Jaromil wrote: > first a premise: if a rewrite is what we are profiling now, then i'm > admittely pushing towards C, feel free to call me conservative...
I strongly agree on this. Let's kill this damn python idiocy! :) > NTK was already prototyped and Alpt demonstrated that the mathematical > model behind it *works* fairly well. what we need now is not a > prototype, but an efficient implementation (and an 100% complete RFC, > but i guess that can get smoothed on the way). > AFAIK even the most advanced language features can be implemented in a > C project - with more overhead, but also more possibilities for later > optimization. ++1 -- [ ::::::::: 73 de IW9HGS : http://freaknet.org/asbesto ::::::::::: ] [ Freaknet Medialab :: Poetry Hacklab : Dyne.Org :: Radio Cybernet ] [ NON SCRIVERMI USANDO LETTERE ACCENTATE - NON MANDARMI ALLEGATI ] [ *I DELETE* EMAIL > 100K, ATTACHMENTS, HTML, M$-WORD DOC and SPAM ] _______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
