The routing protocol is almost the whole netsukuku thing.
Though, the point he is making is nonsense. Also in a network completely
made of nodes with only one wireless network card the protocol would be
perfectly suited.
Imagine 3 nodes in a row. (A) can reach (B) but cannot reach (C); (B) can
reach (C).
((((((((((((((o)))))))))))))))
((((((((((((((o))))))))))|))
(((((((((((((o)))))))))))|))) |
| | |
| | |
(A) (B) (C)
The three nodes all have a wireless adhoc. A packet from (A) to (C) goes
through (B) that acts as a gateway.
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 7:54 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't know if it was me or him, but certainly somebody has missunderstood
> Netsukuku... and in that article he only talks about the routing protocol,
> as if
> that was the whole netsukuku thing, and again, one of us two has
> missunderstood
> QSPN...
>
> --
> gdrooid
>
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 06:19:13PM +0200, Ilario Gelmetti wrote:
> > Hi all!
> > What do you think about this article?
> >
> > "Netsukuku unsuitable for wireless networks"
> > https://we.riseup.net/mbxxii/netsukuk-unsuitable-for-wireless-networks
> >
> > Bye,
> > Ilario Gelmetti
> _______________________________________________
> Netsukuku mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
>
_______________________________________________
Netsukuku mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
