Well, if we focus on the python implementation, I can help you guys develop it.
I know enough python to be able to of use to you guys. But I am incapable of learning C. I have an irrational phobia of C pointers. I am medically diagnosed. It sounds funny, but it's not. On 09/11/2013 04:05 AM, Alexei wrote: > It seems Python much better than C suites for implementation of > complicated netsukuku algoritms. Make notice Luca used even specific > stackless version instead of common Python. I think there was a reason > for it. Easy development, debugging and maintenance is very important > especially when a developer is alone but not only. I rememper Luca > wrote obout difficults in further development of C-version. > Vala gives pythons effectivity and translates its code to fast C-code, > which can be compiled for routers. > > If I'm not mistaken python version is quite ready. Vala version is > working also but it has no yet naming service. Both need of testing > and debugging. Unfortunatelly they are incompatible. > > Actually fast inexpensive routers with a lot of memory are appering > now. See for example Ubiquiti EdgeMAX, they have 512 Mb of RAM. I > thing they could run python version... But my vote is for Vala. For > progammer is not too difficult to take in vala, and it could be easier > then make sense in netsukuku. > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Miss Valeska <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 09/10/2013 12:12 AM, Coyo wrote: > > Interesting. Sounds like Vala is the one we want, then. > > I'm still waiting to figure out how to test vala locally. > > I don't even know where the code is. > > On 09/09/2013 09:41 PM, Valeska Grim wrote: > > From: Alexei <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > As I understand, netsukuku-python is a test > implementation. It is pretty > ready software but is not very demanded because of it does > not run on > modern routers. So vala version is universal, it is faster > and more > preferable in every way, but as I guess very few people > want work with > vala. I thing if vala version will not be done, after some > time people > start using and develop python version on some new > generation of hardware. > > > On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Miss Valeska > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>wrote: > > Also! With Stackless python, Or any of those other > dependencies, Does the > version matter? The version in the commands is 2.6.2, > But would it matter > if I used the most recent version? If so, Does this > also apply to the other > dependencies? > > Oh, Finally, Will netsukuku-python be continued? Or is > netsukuku-vala > going to take over? I think I prefer netsukuku-vala, > I'm not sure, Being it > works on routers though, That is very good. However, > I'm just curious about > your plans Luca. I assume vala will take over. > > > I don't exactly believe that, The python version worked on openwrt > routers, Now it is just out dated because it hasn't been mantained > in years. The C version did too, The C version and python version > are just as universal and fast. I don't know what "preferable in > every way" means, But, I don't see how vala has anything that C, > Or, C++, Doesn't. If you can correct me, I'd be glad to know. >
_______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
