On 17 Sep 2008 19:07:25 +0100 "Chris Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a perfectly working libmng here so I will be building NetSurf > using that only, as I don't see the point in disabling features (on a > desktop platform) and there doesn't seem to be a good reason to > increase the footprint by linking in both libpng and libmng. Well, if you've got PDF export, you've got libpng anyway. Infact, if you've got GTK, you've got libpng anyway. > ISTR similar arguments when Mozilla decided to drop MNG support. If > nobody can view them they're not going to be used, are they? It supported them for some time. Nobody made use of it, and Microsoft essentially committed to never using it, so they removed it for almost precisely the reasons that have been outlined here. B.
