2009/5/29 Philip Boulain <[email protected]> > On 29 May 2009, at 14:50, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > >> Option 2: Mediawiki >> ------------------- >> >> > > On the flipside, this is balanced by its dominance meaning that there being > a lot of people applying gaffer tape to it to keep it progressing and > vaguely working. There are also extensions which may be useful for dealing > with bug reports etc., such as Semantic MediaWiki[1] and Semantic Forms[2]; > piles upon piles of ugly hacks, but the user experience can be that you can > then create instances of types of things, and have a nice little form for > people to fill in details. > > If it's not a complete ballache to administer, this would be my preference, simply because it's what I'd expect people to be most familiar with. I understand that MediaWiki+PostgreSQL is now stable -- Citizendium uses it, for example.
Hertzsprung
