Hello On 06.05.10, you wrote:
> > It's a lot less work than you think. Also, what about writing a native > surface provider for libnsfb rather than these layers of hacks you keep > using? you mean something as the libnsfb/src/surface/x.c but for the amiga OS window /message/graphic funcs ? thats better for a spare time project, this is not so much work and is simular to a firefox backend, and is maybe worth the time, when it is not change in future netsurf.or better wait until 3.0 is out with libdom support and the planed input boxes. but are there plans that the frame buffer on x or when i add maybe a amiga OS backend, give a full browser with tabs, multiple windows, which the SDL Version did not ? > > And we absolutely do not support it, nor the (massive) changes you make > to it. You can either write a proper front end and we'll include it in I do not write lots on netsurf, most make artur, only when he have problems because he cant do it, i help him, so he can continue developing. > the official NetSurf (assuming it's of sufficient quality), or you can > do your own thing and we won't be able to help. > >> Tab browsing is best.but if really more windows are need, SDL 1.3 >> suppport that. > > And the framebuffer version of NetSurf will not support that, because > it is not what it is for. Why do you keep arguing for this? this sound diffrent than you tell first.when the framebuffer should never give a full browser, then also use of amiga OS funcs instead of SDL do not help much. > > B. Regards
