On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 22:29 +0200, m0n0 wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 30.06.2010, 22:13 +0200 schrieb John-Mark Bell > <[email protected]>: > > > No, this is not the correct approach. If you need to detect the version > > of freetype in use, include FT_FREETYPE_H and conditionalise on the > > values of FREETYPE_MAJOR, FREETYPE_MINOR, and FREETYPE_PATCH. > > I believed including ft2build.h is only okay for newer versions of > freetype and I didn't wanted to break compatibility with the old versions.
We were already including ft2build.h from font_freetype.h. Therefore, it's perfectly fine to use that mechanism in font_freetype.c, too. I don't think we've ever supported a version of freetype that pre-dates the introduction of ft2build.h. J.
