On 30/04/2012 10:00, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > We have considered plenty of DVCSs over the years. I've been pushing for a > move from Subversion for the past four or five years. Until recently, the > pain > of the move outweighed the pain of staying, but nowadays it's too painful to > stay. Git "won" the argument in the end because it's the one DVCS the > majority > of us are familiar (if not comfortable) with. It has a lot of good > documentation out there, and while its UI sucks (to say the least) it is > competently implemented and UI can be improved.
<troll> Tried fossil <http://www.fossil-scm.org/>? :D </troll> François.
