On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 09:45:15AM +0000, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > > > +dom_exception dom_html_h_r_element_get_no_shade( > > + dom_html_h_r_element *ele, bool *no_shade); > > The no_shade is good, but I'm slightly confused as to why you're putting > dom_html_h_r_element rather than dom_html_hr_element -- does our conversion > algorithm really expect it this way? > > [snip rest] > > If the test suite really does expect dom_html_h_r_element then I guess I can > accept this patch for now, but overall, I think I'd prefer it if it could be > dom_html_hr_element -- Perhaps John Mark will have some useful input here?
I don't, insofar as I expected the same thing you did! Having looked, however, I think all that is needed here is to add HTMLHRElement => "dom_html_hr_element" to the special_prefix map in DOMTSHandler.pm. J.
