On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 11:44:15 +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote: > If we decide this split is a good idea I want to decide the library > name as well. If we follow the existing netsurf support library > convention it would be called "libns" and all exported functions would > be prefixed with "ns_" > > This name fits reasonably well except it is a bit close to cocoa > library naming where everything is prefixed with "NS" (for nextstep), > This does not conflict (as nsurl etc. currently show) but might be > confusing? > > Other options are libnscore and libnsbrowser. However please remember > we prefix all exported functions with that name so nscore_ and > nsbrowser_ are a bit long. e.g. nsurl_ctreate() becomes nscore_url_create()
Unfortunately 'libns' is the name of various things. A quick google suggests it's too many things to make me happy throwing another thing into the pot. So, instead, I propose: libnetsurfcore with a symbol prefix of nsc_ How does that sit with people? D. -- Daniel Silverstone http://www.netsurf-browser.org/ PGP mail accepted and encouraged. Key Id: 3CCE BABE 206C 3B69
