On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:11:02 +0100 Paul Vigay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why not use a frame instead? For embedding HTML content, they're > > conceptually identical in so far as their annoyances and flaws. > > I didn't really want to use frames due to having to recode the rest > of the page, especially as I've made extensive use of SSIs which > would mean I'd have to do that page differently to all the others. How is this different from using <object> ? > > I lost interest when attempting to wget this results in a 403. > > That's because it's not a live site yet and is currently running from > my test server, which blocks attempts to grab development code off > it. :-) You won't get any precise input from me, then :) Although I could just tell wget via command line parameters to use a different user agent (as anybody else would who wanted to grab your development code), it's not worth the 5 seconds of my time it would take! :-) B.
