On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:41:24 +0000 (GMT) Tim Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > How come, if the domain name is illegal, it has been accepted for > > > registration? I did a whois on it. > > Because registrars are lax. Hostname segments should not begin with > > digits, and this makes it difficult to tell the difference between > > IP addresses and names. > > Is it? http://3663.co.uk/ makes perfect sense. Perfect sense? In what way? By allowing digits as the first characters in such segments, it means much more work has to be done to confirm if it is an IP address or not, and older systems correctly wanted to avoid this, which is why the protocol forbids it, but it just happens to work with modern software. This is much in the same way that many "forbidden" practises are common place in the DNS system (such as CNAMEs pointing to CNAMEs) - just because they happen to work on most machines doesn't make them right. And people like 3com should really know better! > There is something here in email address validation which may be of > relevance: This is a separate, but related issue. > > which is sadly true of most > > people who choose to use PHP > > Oh dear! Not a PHP fan? I have implemented quite a bit of PHP: you > must tell me what I am doing wrong: what is the right way? There's me > thinking Larry Ullman's book would show me the right way: > > http://www.amazon.co.uk/World-Wide-Visual-QuickStart-Guides/dp/0201727870/ref=sr_11_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1225297865&sr=11-1 No, I am not a PHP fan. Partly because it's dreadful and encourages sloppy engineering, but mainly because so many people who use it shouldn't be allowed near it. It is the Visual Basic of web site development systems, except with a far far worse security and performance track record. Right way of what? > My email address is genuine. Please do not reply to this post here. If you didn't want me to reply here, you should have sent your message to me, and not the list. B.
