In message <mpro.l1f73g00000yz00i3.pit...@pittdj.co.uk>
David Pitt <pit...@pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
> Michael Bell <mich...@beaverbell.co.uk> wrote:
>> In message <1272149852.6726.1.ca...@duiker>
>> John-Mark Bell <j...@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 22:10 +0100, Michael Bell wrote:
>>>> In message <510d269ff2t...@netsurf-browser.org>
>>>> Michael Drake <t...@netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate
>>>>> availability of NetSurf 2.5. This release contains many bug fixes
>>>>> and improvements.
>>>>
>>>>> It is available to download from http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
> [snip - incomplete log]
>>> We cannot reproduce this, and the log file you provided contains
>>> insufficient information to allow us to debug this successfully. Do you
>>> still have the full log file? If so, please zip it and email it to me
>>> (off list).
>> Sorry, I have re-visited the sites which it tripped up on, and it worked
>> OK, so I can't do this.
>>
>> Actually I am not a very competent RISC OS user, I am not sure I correctly
>> downloaded NetSurf and I am not sure how to zip file, I never have to do
>> it.
> Is SparkFS on the machine? If not there are alternatives which can be talked
> through.
>> Do you want me to send in any further bug reports?
> I could not reproduce the crash here, but something tripped up NetSurf and
> that is of interest to the developers, if something can happen it will
> happen - again.
> The original full log does need to have been preserved, if it has been
> overwritten then the evidence is lost.
>> It's so sad that NetSurf is not going to be developed further. Maybe I
>> should have come to Wakefield.
> The NetSurf developers have done a very good job with version 2.50, if this
> is the end of the road due to lack of RISC OS developers then 2.50 is a
> reasonably good place to be.
Now I think about it, I have got SparkFS on my machine, so I could
used that. The original log has been lost.
Michael Bell
--
