In message <mpro.l1f73g00000yz00i3.pit...@pittdj.co.uk> David Pitt <pit...@pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
> Michael Bell <mich...@beaverbell.co.uk> wrote: >> In message <1272149852.6726.1.ca...@duiker> >> John-Mark Bell <j...@netsurf-browser.org> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 22:10 +0100, Michael Bell wrote: >>>> In message <510d269ff2t...@netsurf-browser.org> >>>> Michael Drake <t...@netsurf-browser.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate >>>>> availability of NetSurf 2.5. This release contains many bug fixes >>>>> and improvements. >>>> >>>>> It is available to download from http://www.netsurf-browser.org/ > [snip - incomplete log] >>> We cannot reproduce this, and the log file you provided contains >>> insufficient information to allow us to debug this successfully. Do you >>> still have the full log file? If so, please zip it and email it to me >>> (off list). >> Sorry, I have re-visited the sites which it tripped up on, and it worked >> OK, so I can't do this. >> >> Actually I am not a very competent RISC OS user, I am not sure I correctly >> downloaded NetSurf and I am not sure how to zip file, I never have to do >> it. > Is SparkFS on the machine? If not there are alternatives which can be talked > through. >> Do you want me to send in any further bug reports? > I could not reproduce the crash here, but something tripped up NetSurf and > that is of interest to the developers, if something can happen it will > happen - again. > The original full log does need to have been preserved, if it has been > overwritten then the evidence is lost. >> It's so sad that NetSurf is not going to be developed further. Maybe I >> should have come to Wakefield. > The NetSurf developers have done a very good job with version 2.50, if this > is the end of the road due to lack of RISC OS developers then 2.50 is a > reasonably good place to be. Now I think about it, I have got SparkFS on my machine, so I could used that. The original log has been lost. Michael Bell --