In article <534d692c69t...@netsurf-browser.org>, Michael Drake <t...@netsurf-browser.org> wrote: > In article <534d633ccb...@timil.com>, > Tim Hill <t...@timil.com> wrote:
> > Site: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/ > > Build #1177: 13.0s > > Build #1178: 13.7s > > Build #1179: 22.6s > > Site: http://slashdot.org/ > > Build #1177: 8.5s > > Build #1178: 8.4s > > Build #1179: 25.0s > The #1179 results are odd. Was that with JavaScript on, or with the > computer busy doing something else? On. On the one hand I didn't think anything else was going at the time but on the other I can't repeat those times. Now 10s and 13.2s. Timings are representative of several attempts in all cases.
