Thanks for such a swift reply, Michael. Will digest and report back. You said: > The min-content value for width is just at editors draft stage. > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-3/ > So it's subject to change, and not standardized yet.
In the final para of my post, I didn't quote all the code I found in that Stackoverflow suggestion about width:min-content (which was dated 2015). The writer included interim lines addressed to specific browsers while the aforementioned editors' deliberations continue. He suggested: figure { width: -webkit-min-content; width: -moz-min-content; width: min-content; } That seems to mean Mozilla and Webkit. Is there perhaps an equivalent for Netsurf? -- Jim Nagel www.archivemag.co.uk || See you at the show? www.riscos-swshow.co.uk Feb 24