I haven't really followed the run-up to this debate but in the Guardian article about it the actual content of the proposed code of conduct is described as: "Unacceptable is defined as content that is used to abuse, harass, stalk or threaten others; is libellous or misrepresentative; or infringes copyright, confidentiality or privacy rights" (http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,2053530,00.html)
what's copyright doing in this line-up? does it have anything to do with abuse v civility? is this proposal a sort of trojan horse for copyright owners to claw back some territory? len -- ----- Lennaart van Oldenborgh London [EMAIL PROTECTED] # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]