Are not all interviews fraudulent? The inept preparation, the phony stage sets, the hiddent gang supporting and directing the narrowscoped performance (phonily exposed in the making of the dreck), the cosmetics of face, behavior, dress, sound and close-ups, the very concept is simulacra of a disorganized discourse, heavily edited afterwards, harshly scheduled and negotiated beforehand, positioned in a schedule of peurile dissemblings and advertisements even on those fora for advertising governments, perhaps especially those propagandistic shenanigans, especially those on RFE and public television, radio and free newsprint.
No doubt Google books and edu lectures and trade seminars and promotional colloquia and vacuous conferences on idiotic topics are just as senseless log-rolling backscratching, the couldn't give a shit audiences mindwandering far away until the chance to interject a spasm of unct or disfunct. God's will is to constrict bladders in the most seasoned to shorten offensive presence. I say, speaking for yourself? Mention should be made of the seminal initiative of Alan Sonheim's Fiction of Philosophy which demonstrated how to do this suicidal smackdown. Hi Alan. You are being read and adhered closely. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
